I’m a little curious.
A few weeks ago, American forces nailed Osama Bin Laden and while I haven’t had a chance to write about this prior to now, something about the whole thing has really bothered me quite a bit.
The problem I’m having with all of it is, while I can acknowledge that OBL was not a nice guy by any stretch of the imagination, isn’t the administration acting a bit schizophrenically?
Wasn’t this the same administration that bandied about the idea (though a bit wrong headed) of bringing captured combatants from Guantanamo Bay up to New York City to hold trials?
Five Guantanamo Bay detainees with alleged ties to the 9/11 conspiracy, including accused mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, will be transferred to New York to go on trial in civilian court, Attorney General Eric Holder announced Friday.So one has to ask, what happened?
Mohammed, Ramzi Bin al-Shibh, Walid bin Attash, Ali Abdul Aziz Ali and Mustafa Ahmed al-Hawsawi will all be transferred to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York -- a short distance from the World Trade Center towers that were destroyed in the September 11 attacks.
Holder said that he believes the trials could have been held in New York or Virginia, but that Congress imposed restrictions on where the trial could be held, taking the decision from his hands.Now, again I ask if one of the things the administration was trying to reinforce to the world is that we as a nation are about high ideals and following the rule of law, then where I ask does state sponsored assassination fit into the equation?
“Those restrictions are unlikely to be repealed in the immediate future,” the attorney general said. “We simply cannot allow a trial to be delayed any longer for the victims of the 9/11 attacks or for their family members who have waited for nearly a decade for justice. I have talked to these family members on many occasions over the last two years. Like many Americans, they differ on where the 9/11 conspirators should be prosecuted, but there is one thing on which they all agree: We must bring the conspirators to justice.”
And anyone who thinks this was anything less than state sponsored assassination is leading a delusional existence.
Further, I again wonder where the outcry is? Where is the cry from civil libertarians? Let’s take this one step further, is this in fact setting a bad precedent?
And this has been something of the hallmark of this administration’s foreign policy, especially when it comes to dealing with the Arab world because it is fairly obvious we are well behind the curve and do not have a cohesive policy for dealing with the nation‘s and people’s involved.
I listened for eight years while people cast all kinds of aspersions on George W. Bush and even though I didn’t vote for the guy either time, I simple could not understand where this righteous indignation swelled from and now to see all that is going on and to witness what is a deafening silence from the very same groups that clamored so loudly against American military action and intervention in various parts of the world... well, it just rings a bit hollow.
I stopped there and this sat in the drafts queue until now.
As the clock winds down on the last few weeks of the Obama administration I have to admit to buyer’s remorse. While it looks like the one truly good piece of legislation I can credit to the soon to be former President may be dismantled in short order (I’m talking about the ACA), a lot of the things I had hoped for the President to achieve fell by the wayside.
While I can ascribe a certain amount of that to the lack of cooperation on the part of Congress, I have to assign equal blame to the President.
Foreign Policy wise the last eight years have been an absolute failure. As a matter of fact, you could look to the President as being one of the people most responsible for the rise of the conservative movement in Europe and Brexit to a certain extent. The hits just keep coming... Ukraine, Crimea, Syria, Libya, Yemen, Iraq, North Korea, China, Iran.
Aside from the fact that this President was likely responsible for more assassinations (through the CIA’s drone program) than any of his predecessors, there has been a remarkable disconnect between public policy and action.
Domestically... feh. A social agenda advanced in lieu of an economic one, it’s that failure that you can point to that prompted people not to vote for a ‘third term’ of Obama.
I look back now and I have to chuckle having watched Hillary try and take credit for the OBL raid and assassination when it was the work of a slew of people for years that made the thing possible.
Of course, it really is a gift no matter how you look at it. The world is a slightly better place without our pal Osama in it and hopefully it did serve notice on a whole host of people that ultimately we will find you and kill you if you should attack us - not a bad message to send no matter who is mailing the envelope.



